Skip to content
CorpDev Wiki
4 min read

Continuous Sourcing and Target Intelligence

Continuous sourcing maintains a researched view of the companies that fit your strategy and the relationships that may lead to a deal. Its output is a qualified opportunity with a reason to act, an owner, and a next step.

Design the system to improve market coverage and judgment. A larger company list is useful only if the team can explain who belongs on it and what remains unknown.

Map the market before filling the pipeline

Translate the thesis into segments and explicit inclusion rules. Define products, customer groups, geographies, and business models that matter to the acquisition case.

Search several permitted sources and retain how each company was found. Compare source coverage by segment. An empty segment may reflect poor data coverage rather than an absence of companies.

Separate the market universe from the active deal pipeline. Keep a research status for companies not yet qualified and a relationship status for qualified targets. This prevents a sales-style funnel from disguising how much of the market remains unexamined.

Qualify each target with inspectable evidence

Apply mandatory conditions before ranking preferences. Keep strategic fit, business quality, evidence completeness, and seller readiness separate.

This hypothetical shortlist shows the decisions hidden by one combined score.

Target Strategic fit Evidence state Relationship state Next action
Alder Strong workflow match Product rights unclear Warm introduction available Verify ownership before advancing
Birch Strong customer overlap Core criteria supported No current sale interest Assign relationship owner
Cedar Adjacent product Required integration absent Seller actively seeking bids Review only through a thesis exception

Ask reviewers to record why they change the system's classification. A mistaken company identity calls for a data repair. A disputed criterion calls for a policy decision. Those require different corrections.

Treat developments as hypotheses about timing

Leadership changes, funding events, product launches, and acquisitions can justify a fresh look. A signal should explain what changed, why it relates to the thesis, and which action is proposed.

Do not equate a signal with willingness to sell. Link it to relationship history. A founder who asked for no further contact should not receive another approach because a news model produced a high score.

Store the source date and observation date. Distinguish a new event from an old story republished this week. Suppress repeated alerts for the same event unless new evidence changes the interpretation.

Give every relationship a responsible person

Maintain the contact owner, last interaction, agreed next step, communication preferences, and permitted notes. Check shared ownership before outreach so two business units do not approach the same company independently.

The AI workflow may prepare a brief or draft. External communication requires the authorized relationship owner and the organization's communication controls. Put approval at the action boundary rather than relying on a sentence inside a prompt.

In CorpDev.Ai

Describe the target universe in plain English, inspect the deduplicated results, and qualify candidates with AI columns. Move priority companies to your pipeline, where research and significant company developments can inform the next action.

Find and qualify targets · Maintain the pipeline

Search for the companies your screen misses

Review a sample of rejected and unresolved companies alongside the highest-ranked targets. Check identity matches, evidence quality, and the exact criterion behind each exclusion.

This hypothetical review exposes errors that a growing target list would hide.

Initial decision Review finding Follow-up
Exclude: services only Product manual describes customer software licenses Ask whether software is separately sold and owned
Advance: domestic target Website belongs to a foreign parent Resolve operating entity and geographic scope

Verify candidate reversals before changing the rubric. Test the revised screen on an untouched sample: fixing one missed company may admit many poor matches. Record the sampling method and review date, including companies that remain unknown.

Continue with repeatable diligence, measurement and learning, and target sourcing fundamentals.